Obama Recess Appointments Wrongly Rejected By Republican Judges

Posted on Jan 27 2013 - 12:41am by Zennie Abraham

On the surface, the decision of the judges in the case of Noel Canning v. NLRB to declare invalid the January 4, 2012 appointments of Democratic members Richard Griffin and Sharon Block and Republican member Terrance Flynn (who have since resigned) may appear to be “ground breaking” but given that they were made by three Republican Judges, it’s not that, as much as it is partisan politics, writ large.

But first, Article II, Section II of the U.S. Constitution states that “The President shall have power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”

But before we go to the political problem, let’s look at where the case turned: on the appointment of the three temporary board members – done to shore up a massive caseload problem at the NLRB, and made during a Senate recess. The United States Court of Appeals, DC Circuit said that the NLRB never determined what a “recess” was. The idea critics have is that the time of Obama’s appointments wasn’t really a Christmas holiday recess.

Indeed, the DC Circuit Court writes “At the time of the President’s purported recessappointments of the three Board members, the Senate was operating pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, which
provided that the Senate would meet in pro formasessions every
three business days from December 20, 2011, through January
23, 2012. 157 Cong. Rec. S8,783–84 (daily ed. Dec. 17, 2011).
The agreement stated that “no business [would be] conducted”
during those sessions. Id. at S8,783. During the December 23
pro forma session, the Senate overrode its prior agreement by
unanimous consent and passed a temporary extension to the
payroll tax.”

But as we will learn, that has nothing to do with what the U.S. Senate says is a recess for its purposes. Under that definition, a recess could have occurred during that period of special operation.

Moreover, the problem is that the appointments were made, but then the court said that because they were not valid (under that court’s view) their was no quorum. That reads as reverse logic – if the appointments were made, then they’re valid. To determine that after the fact seems pointless.

But the main point of this case is when is a recess appointment just that. The DC Circuit Court decision doesn’t invalidate every recess appointment President Obama has made and any report asserting such is totally irresponsible.

In this case, the argument was that the Senate was not in recess because of a special set of meetings on tax reform.

What’s troubling about the U.S. Circuit Court’s decision is it totally ignores the U.S. Senate’s own stated definition of what a recess is .

It’s this:

recess – A temporary interruption of the Senate’s proceedings, sometimes within the same day. The Senate may also recess overnight rather than adjourn at the end of the day. Recess also refers to longer breaks, such as the breaks taken during holiday periods, pursuant to concurrent resolution.

Thus, the court would seem to have incorrectly determined what a Senate recess is, preferring to dig up every other meaning of the term, other than the one that applies to The U.S. Senate. Moreover, it’s the one that was in effect when the temporary appointments were made last year.

Again, the DC Circuit Court failed to look at the U.S. Senate definition of recess.

That’s wrong.

And now we come back to the fact that the DC Circuit consists of Republican judges. It calls into question the validity of their decision. If a mix of Democratic and Republican judges were on the DC Circuit in this case, it’s fair to say that a more balanced view would have prevailed, and not one that seemed bent on curtailing the President’s power, even above the reasoned review of the case.

Prediction: Obama wins on appeal.

Zennie62 is also a YouTube Channel. In fact, Zennie62 is one of the first group of Youtube Partner Channels dating back to 2008. News commentary and news video-blogs are uploaded daily.

Zennie62 is a part of Zennie62Media and annually covers the NFL Draft, Comic Con, WonderCon, International CES in Las Vegas, the Academy Awards, and numerous tech events.

Just click here to see our latest: Zennie62 On YouTube! And if you're interested in becoming a sponsor, or having your brand mentioned here, or both, visit the Sponsor Zennie62 page.

About the Author

Zennie Abraham is the founder of Zennie62Media which consists of http://www.zennie62blog.com and a multimedia blog news aggregator and video network, and 78-blog network, with social media and content development services and consulting. Zennie is a pioneer video blogger, YouTube Partner, social media practitioner, game developer, and pundit. Note: news aggregator content does not reflect the personal views of Mr. Abraham. Visit http://www.youtube.com/user/zennie62 and http://www.tout.com/u/zennie62 - follow on Twitter @zennie62

  • Tim

    Neither the senate nor the president can define Recess. Why? Cause the constitution does and they cannot simply change it. Moreover the senate was in session under rules set by Harry Reid during bush administration. You cannot squirt chicken sh&t& out of both sides of your mouth . If it was legit during bush it has to be legit duringobama.

  • http://zennie62blog.com/ Zennie Abraham

    Your comment says two things at once. But the bottom line is the Senate definition of what recess is, is on its website, not set by Harry Reid. Where you got that idea is beyond me, but it’s just plain wrong.