Tara Flanagan, Alameda Co. Judge Candidate: Blogger’s Illegal Campaign Sign Blast Wrong

Posted on Jun 4 2012 - 10:50pm by Zennie Abraham

Tara Flanagan, who’s arguably the front runner in the race for Alameda County Superior Court Judge, has been the target of a blogger who claims that she’s “illegally” posting her campaign signs (“Don’t Vote for Tara Flanagan for Judge” he says). This is the meat of what Mark Welch wrote on his blog:

I just had a fascinating conversation with Tara Flanagan, who is a candidate for Superior Court Judge in Alameda County. After I informed her that her campaign signs were posted illegally on public property, she demurred and dissembled.

First, she asserted that I should not talk with her about this, but instead I should talk to her “consultant firm,” which posted the signs (like most persons accused of any crime, she sought to shift responsibility to others).

When I pointed out how bad this looked in a candidate for judge, she said that she’d personally spoken with someone at the City of Hayward who told her it was OK (ignorance of the law, or misinformation or a misunderstanding, is an excuse).

And Welch refers to another blog post installed in 2010, where he claims candidates can’t post a campaign sign on public property, but get this, Welch fails to actually note where it says that in the state law.

What’s worse is that he then goes on this rampage, taking down the signs belonging to, in that case, Nadia Lockyer.

Why Mark Welch Is Wrong

When you run for office, you have to complete a candidate’s application, which also includes a letter assigning responsibility for the removal of your campaign signs when necessary. Here’s what it says:

As a candidate or campaign worker for either office or a ballot measure, this reminder about State law governing campaign signs should be helpful to you.

Section 5405.3 of the State Outdoor Advertising Act exempts the placing of Temporary Political Signs from normal outdoor advertising display requirements.

A Temporary Political Sign meets the following criteria:

Encourages a particular vote in a schedule election.
Is placed not sooner than 90 days prior to the schedule election and is removed within 10 days after that election.
Is no larger than 32 square feet.
Has had a Statement of Responsibility filed with the Department certifying a person who will be responsible for removing the sign.

A completed Statement of Responsibility [Acrobat PDF] must be submitted to:

Division of Traffic Operations
Outdoor Advertising Program
P.O. Box 942874, MS-36
Sacramento, CA 94274-0001.

Temporary Political Signs shall not be placed within the right-of-way of any highway , or be visible within 660 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of a classified “Landscaped freeway”.
State law directs the Department of Transportation to remove unauthorized Temporary Political Signs and bill the responsible party for their removal. We are calling these provisions to your attention to avoid possible embarrassment or inconvenience to you and your supporters. Please share this information with those assisting in your campaign.
Should you have any questions, comments or need additional information, please call (916) 654-5327.

Note that it says nothing at all about public property. Nothing. And remember, standard California laws concerning outdoor ads don’t apply here.

Also, and to be sure, I placed a call to Dave Macdonald, the Alameda County Registrar of Voters boss who’s expertly represented Alameda County for many years. His office handles candidates running for office in Alameda County. Regarding the restriction of political signs to private property, Dave said that “I’ve not heard of that before,” but did say that local individual civic laws apply, and you, of course, can’t post signs at the local city hall. But Mark Welch’s open interpretation of that law includes any public property, including rights-of-way, and on that Mr. Macdonald remarked “That’s not something I’ve ever heard of at all.”

And he’s the boss of elections in Alameda County.

I think Mr. Welch owes Tara Flanagan a big apology. It’s too late to fine him for the Nadia Lockyer sign-take-down action, but Mr. Welch should stop this kind of activity in the future.

About the Author
Zennie Abraham

Zennie Abraham is the founder of Zennie62Media which consists of http://www.zennie62blog.com and a multimedia blog and video network, and social media and content development services and consulting. Zennie is a pioneer video blogger, YouTube Partner, social media practitioner, game developer, and pundit. Visit http://www.youtube.com/user/zennie62 and http://www.tout.com/u/zennie62 - follow on Twitter @zennie62

  • http://www.facebook.com/MarkWelchMktg Mark Welch

    Hayward: “SEC. 10-7.300  GENERAL REGULATIONS.  (a) The following regulations shall apply to all signs in all districts within the city.  No sign may be placed in any of the following areas: …
      (2) On any public property”  http://www.hayward-ca.gov/municipal/HMCWEB/SignRegulations.pdf

    See also http://www.bayeast.org/sign_ordinances

    Since you waited until the day before the election to post this, I don’t have time to dig out my notes.

    • http://zennie62blog.com/ Zennie Abraham

       Sorry, but the State Of California’s exemption applies to Hayward, too.  I also did not “wait” – implying that I knew of your post days before – I saw it six hours ago today. But the bottom line is you’re not correctly interpreting the law.  Sorry. 

      • http://www.facebook.com/MarkWelchMktg Mark Welch

        The state law provides an “exemption” to the law which generally prohibits advertising ON PRIVATE PROPERTY FACING STATE HIGHWAYS, not to other laws or statutes. So, even though it’s normally illegal to post a sign on your own property facing a state highway, there is an exception for political signs during the 90-day period leading up to an election. It is never legal to post a sign on public property.

        I don’t know what your background is in journalism or law, nor why you’d choose to argue over this issue without doing any research at all, apart from reading a CalTrans form and conducting a single interview with someone who admits to having no relevant knowledge about sign law.

        I do apologize for writing that you’d “waited,” as my point was that the timing of your post didn’t allow me time to dig out my notes or repeat my earlier research. It’s not your fault that you didn’t see my post until today.

        • http://zennie62blog.com/ Zennie Abraham

           Sorry, but it’s not a battle of views.  The head of elections of the entire County Of Alameda personally told me you’re wrong.  I think you’re trying to bend reality to fit your view of how the World should work.  Moreover, that process has caused you to take an approach that’s not unlike a vigilante.  That’s the common view of county officials – be careful. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/MarkWelchMktg Mark Welch

    You’re right that the CalTrans candidate letter only refers to signs near state highways, not to other public property. I’ve pointed out to CalTrans that some candidates have claimed that they misunderstood the letter as providing a complete list of excluded locations (though that’s not a reasonable interpretation), and I’ve asked CalTrans to change the letter. They haven’t responded.

    The Alameda County Registrar of Voters is surely an expert on election procedures, but not on sign law. Try following your logic: you quote the registrar as acknowledging that it’s illegal to post campaign signs on City Hall, and that “individual civic laws apply.” The fact that he says he’s not heard of a law, doesn’t mean there are no such laws.

    Have you made any effort to research the issue, and look for laws or ordinances? Apparently not, because when I searched for “hayward sign ordinance” I immediately found the city’s ordinance and its language prohibiting signs on all public property.

    I can understand that many people might be unaware of local ordinances, especially in cities where they don’t reside.

    But doesn’t common sense suggest to you that it ought to be illegal for people to post signs on public property, and if you decide that posting signs on public property is something you want to do, doesn’t it make sense that you should research the law on the topic?